Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Lonely Hearts

"Can someone make my simple wish come true? Is it you?" (Cope, 973). 


     The villanelle form in which Wendy Cope chose to write "Lonely Hearts" helps create a lonely and empty tone.  Additionally, the questions asked at the end of each tercet suggest the search for the person is ongoing.  The search for "the one" has resulted in failure various times for these people.  The villanelle form allowed Cope to construct the poem in a way so that it appeared like advertisements in a newspaper.  There is something ironic in the fact that these people are looking for the one but the one has to meet certain requirements.  The ironic aspect of this is that nearly every story ever told about love or friendship gets its happy ending when one person stops forcing others to meet their requirements and starts working on bettering themselves and making themselves more worthy of a great love.  This creates this sense that these requests/desperations will result in failure which puts the reader in a melancholy state knowing these wishes will most likely not be fulfilled.  At first, I wondered whether or not the location of North London held much significance.  The connection it appears is the common association of London with rain and rain with loneliness.

Bright Star

    When I first read John Keats' "Bright Star", I initially making a connection between the stars and love.  As I read it again, it seems as if he is comparing and contrasting the way the world is viewed.  There is great beauty to be seen from a distance, like a star would.  From above, the world would appear more calm and quaint than it actually is.  "And watching, with eternal lids apart, Like nature's patient, sleepless Eremite, The moving waters at their priestlike task Of pure ablution round earth's human shores," (Keats, 792).  Though Keats creates such a serene image with this language, he also proclaims the beauty that can experienced on earth as well; this beauty is not strictly visual either.  The stability and serenity the perspective of a star offers is tempting, yet it is both unobtainable and unfulfilled.  In this poem, Keats, in a way, asks the question of whether people prefer to consistently see beauty and perfection or experience life in a more active, realistic role that is somehow much more fulfilling.

     This particular poem reminded me of a song I heard a long time ago on a t.v. show.  It takes the same message Keats sends by contrasting perfect beauty with reality.

Eveline

     James Joyce's character of Eveline has extremely clouded judgement.  Her childhood was obviously rocky; therefore, she does not have a clear grasp on her own self-worth.  When she is offered the chance to escape, it seems a simple decision to make.  However, this decision is clouded by the way she has chosen to look back on her life in her moment of nostalgia.  With full knowledge of her father's abuse, she chooses to remember the good despite the severity of the bad things that have happened to her.  As she recalls the memories of her childhood, she implies a desire to be back in the place which has a significant effect on her decision to not join Frank.  However, the life she had as a child cannot be restored.  Her mother has passed, and her brother has moved away.  The life she longs for no longer exists; she is negligent of the passing of time and how drastically her life has changed since childhood.  "Home!  She looked around the room, reviewing all tis familiar objects which she had dusted once a week for so many years, wondering where on earth all the dust came from" (James Joyce, 218).  The only thing that has remained stable throughout this time has been her father.  Her life seems based upon stability in that she recalls components of childhood play like clock-work.   On some level, Eveline must find some comfort in this stability which fuels her reason for not joining Frank on the ship.

How I Met My Husband

      Alice Munro juxtaposes the characters of Alice Kelling and Edie in multiple ways in her short story.  The reader sees their different appearances as it is presented to them through the eyes of Edie.  Edie claims there is a lack of youth in her appearance which Edie clearly must have considering her age.  Differences between the two characters can also be seen through their relationships with Chris Watters.  In her own mind, Edie feels she has a better insight into who Chris is and what he feels; this was highlighted by the fact that Chris Watters character is mainly referred to only by his first name (in Edie's speech and thoughts) while the rest of the characters are referred to by either solely last names or their full name (i.e. The character of Alice is referred to as Alice Kelling throughout the entirety of the short story.).  In the story's concluding paragraphs, Edie makes the contrast between Alice and herself evident.  "If there were women all through life waiting, and women busy and not waiting, I knew which I had to be.  Even though there might be things the second kind of women have to pass up and never know about, it still is better" (Munro, 146).  Alice Kelling has spent a considerable amount of time waiting for Chris to at least make a decision about their relationship.  She follows him to figure out whether he actually intends to marry her or if he will finally break it off with her.  She is the type of woman who waits.  Edie decides she cannot be this person and moves on with her life by marrying the mailman.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Mary Shelley-"Frankenstein" Part 2.


The Ultimate Cliffhanger. 

"I was at first touched by the expression of his misery; yet, when I called to mind what Frankenstein had said of his powers of eloquence and persuasion, and when I again cast my eyes on the lifeless form of my friend, indignation was rekindled within me" (Shelley, 164).

The conclusion to Shelley's "Frankenstein" may or may not be a cliffhanger due to how the reader perceived Victor and the creature throughout the story.  The creature claims he is going to go to the North Pole to commit suicide after he has been reassured of the death of his creator.  This causes me to doubt whether or not he will actually do it.  The creature claims he was suffering significantly more than Victor; therefore,  I do not see why he would need to see Victor dead before himself.  I do not see what Victor's death accomplishes for the creature.  Additionally, the scene in which the creature kills Elizabeth causes me to question whether or not he actually goes to die in the end.  When Victor looks up and sees the creature out the window, the creature is grinning and points to the lifeless body of Elizabeth.  This made me believe that the creature had lost any sense of humanity that he had managed to gain from the DeLacey family.  Based on this evidence, whether or not the creature dies in the end can be called into question. 

Mary Shelley-"Frankenstein" Part 2

The Magistrate. 

The character of Mr. Kirwin has been a source of great confusion for me.  He appears twice.  His first appearance is during the trial of Victor.  Given that he speaks Victor's native language, he hears Victor's "real" story.  At this point though, I do not think Mr. Kirwin completely understands what is meant by the term "fiend".  When Victor awakens from his apparent insanity, it seems as though the magistrate knows everything.  "As Mr. Kirwin said this, notwithstanding the agitation I endured on this retrospect of my sufferings, I also felt considerable surprise at the knowledge he seemed to possess concerning me" (Shelley, 132).  From this, the reader concludes that the magistrate has learned about Victor's case and somehow believes it.  Yet when Victor asks for help in searching for the creature, the magistrate seems to express some doubt in Victor's story.  He claims they cannot search for him because he seems unobtainable, but the reader can still infer a sense of disbelief coming from Mr. Kirwin.  Therefore, whether or not the magistrate knows about the creature is ambiguous.   

Mary Shelley-"Frankenstein" Part 2

The Evolution of Henry, Victor, and the creature.

When the novel opens, the similarities between the characters of Henry and Victor are apparent.  Both men are ambitious and have a deep desire to learn.  At the creation of the creature, it seems that he and Victor could not be more different.  As the novel progresses, this changes drastically.  When Henry and Victor make their way to England, their differences become more and more obvious.  In a way, the two become foil characters.  Henry finds joy in every moment of life.  Clerval's desire to learn augments each day; he even plans on going to India to further his education.  The only thing that ever brings him down is the disposition of his dear friend, Victor.  Victor has been living in constant fear and worry.  "He was forever busy, and the only check to his enjoyments was to my sorrowful and dejected mind" (Shelley, 115)  Additionally, his thought process has begun to mirror that of the creature.  He refers to himself as "wretch" and often separates him from human society.